Real Book

All things literature, from bibliophile discussion to the latest bestseller news

You are here

Why I Hate Cormac McCarthy's "The Road" I HATE IT SO MUCH FROTH FOAM GNASH

Replies

sarajean's picture
Submitted by sarajean on

Eek, you really hate The Road! I have a lot of friends who don't like it either. It seems like one of those love-it-or-hate-it books. I haven't read the others you've referenced yet, but I really loved both The Road and Child of God. I'll have to go back to reading more McCarthy.

I like the "what if?" feeling of the book, and the possibilities of lone survivors and the unknown time and cause (sort of like in City of Ember--is there artificial light somewhere? Are there colonies of survivors? So much unsaid!), but you're right about some of the nuances, such as smelling meat--and about the boy. Little boys are always annoying at some point; I'm betting that post-Apocalyptic ones would be too. ;)

Holy cow, that reminds me--did you hear about the barrel of medieval butter that was found? It was like wax or something after so many years. Incredible. 

erika's picture
Submitted by erika on

I agree that it's definitely a "love it or hate it" book. Whenever I explain why I hated it to someone who loved it they always say "well sure, but I still like it." Which, you know, fair enough!

 

And no, I hadn't heard that about the ancient butter, but I just looked it up.  Hilarious!  Apparently a few of the scientists even tried a bit!

 

Although since it was preserved in a peat bog, I'm still going to go with my "butter is a dairy product, and cannot be stored long term in a bomb shelter."

Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous on

Um . . you do know what a metaphor is right?

And, just quickly, it was not 20 years between when the event happened and when The Road begins, so it is possible that in a climate controled situation (especially if the people who stocked the shelter survived and were later killed) that food might have been edible.

It is all beside the point, the book is clearly a parable.

erika's picture
Submitted by erika on

I totally know what a metaphor is, and I think the point you're trying to make is that "The Road" is an allegory.  I submit to you that just because it's allegorical, that doesn't mean it doesn't have to make sense. 

 

And exactly how long do you think eggs will last, even in a "climate controlled situation"? 

Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous on

Wow, this reads like a literary criticism from the mind of a Dan Brown fan. Your opinion isn't worth the gum stuck to the sole of my shoe.

erika's picture
Submitted by erika on

I've been savoring the deliciousness of being called a "Dan Brown fan" by someone defending an Oprah book.

 

Dude, everyone knows if you wanna be snobby, you gots to trash the Oprah books. The correct way to do this is to sneer at The Road, while defending Blood Meridian, and clucking at McCarthy for having jumped the shark.

 

Get with the program! Chop chop!

anonymous's picture
Submitted by anonymous on

Seriously, not trying to be a hipster here, but Blood Meridian was great. It characterised the kid in a complex way that The Road failed. 

Overall though, The Road is terrible, and not just because of the continuity/science/logic bit. It is a book that is written by a well-fed author trying to point out the obvious about the human sould and brutality of survival. It reads like a self-immolation-oriented masturbatory fodder. Furthermore, it doesn't open any new windows on reality, or at least offers no more insight than the words "life sucks, people suck, and then you die. Now go try to be happy". 

sarajean's picture
Submitted by sarajean on

You're just being plain rude. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I love McCarthy, but erika has some valid points. Why not contribute to the discussion rather than behave like that?

lisala's picture
Submitted by lisala on

Wow, that's a lovely critical reading Anonymous.

I can't really refute Erika's post--I tried to read The Road, I really did. I couldn't finish it. It was pretentious, and boring--Rusell Hoban did the stylistic schitick already in Riddley Walker, twenties years ago, and Miller's Canticle For Leibowitz pretty much did the basic plot better as well. In short, there was no story, for me, to awaken the narrative lust, and the style was too much "look at me! Did ya see how I did that? Syncope! I engaged in syncope!" to make it interesting.

But, as has been said, to each their own, right? It's just specificity is ever so much more interesting, engaging, and helpful, than ad hominem.

Lissener's picture
Submitted by Lissener on

Thank you so much for this. I utterly detested this novel. I don't like CMC to begin with--I don't have much of a taste for the violent Catholic patriarch's view of the world. Me, I like being human, meaning an ape who hangs out with birds and trees. But that's beside the point.

In my view The Road was an execration. For the reasons you note--the absolute laziness, the disrespect for the reader. It reminded me of Catholic school theology class. "Shut up and accept what I'm saying, don't ask questions."

The child worship also frosted me. Sorry, kids don't come That Perfect. For one thing, a kid born into that situation would be riddled with physical problems. How would it have gotten enough food even to grow the bones and muscles with, to walk? 

I just hate this book so much, but I also hate the religious fervor with which people respond positively to it. It's as though they love the idea of this godlike presence (the author) creating a world where everyone either dies or suffers. 

My favorite post-ap novel? Riddley Walker. So funny, stark, scary, witty, insightful. 

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.